From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects.
Click [show] for further details |
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the county of Surrey in South East England.
If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.) |
Low |
This article is on a subject of Low-importance for Surrey-related articles. |
|
Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
Surrey WikiProject tasks:
|
|
This article is within the scope of the Kent WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the county of Kent in South East England.
If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.) |
Low |
This article is on a subject of low-importance for Kent-related articles. |
|
Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
|
|
[edit] Photos
I'm putting these nice photos here. I think if they in the page is just reiterates that the page is lacking info. Perhaps when there is new text they could be readded. SuzanneKn 17:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Highest point
Notwithstanding the reference on the National Trails site [1] that was cited, that is not the highest point - not by a long way. Much of the route is higher than 172 metres - including quite a lot of Box Hill! Personal observation of the map leads me to believe that Botley Hill is the high point, though the route doesn't quite reach its high point of 267 metres, so I've put approx. 260 metres based on the countour lines - though I suspect it is slightly more than that and that the contour lines are slightly inaccurate.
(I am contacting National Trails to advise them of the error on their site.) StephenDawson 09:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)