Talk:North Channel (Great Britain and Ireland)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rename Article to North Channel (Britain and Ireland)
I propose that this article is renamed to "North Channel (Britain and Ireland)". It is a more appropriate disambiguation, and is more accurate. Bardcom (talk) 19:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support renaming - it's the channel between Britain and Ireland, after all, not the channel between the British Isles and the mainland. BastunBaStun not BaTsun 20:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- Surely North Channel (Irish Sea) is more accurate?Traditional unionist (talk) 18:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
I too think North Channel (Irish Sea) is the right way forwards here. --Jza84 | Talk 20:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Surely it would be a part of the Irish Sea and therefore using the wider body it is a part of is the best option. Thats my 2p worth anyway.Traditional unionist (talk) 20:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- That's a very bad idea. The North Channel is not part of the Irish Sea per se, neither is St George's Channel. They are three distinct entities. One Night In Hackney303 22:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Straw Poll
From other discussions elsewhere, I'd like to propose the following options. Please indicate your support or opposition accordingly. Bardcom (talk) 14:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
This poll has closed. The result is to change the article to North Channel (Great Britain and Ireland) with 3 supports and only one oppose. Bardcom (talk) 19:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- Option 1 - North Channel (Great Britain and Ireland)
-
- Support I think this is the best term as it uses geographical names of islands Bardcom (talk) 12:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Why use four words when two would do? Waggers (talk) 13:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support Most accurate. BastunBaStun not BaTsun 13:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support Counter-revolutionary (talk) 14:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Option 2 - North Channel (Irish Sea)
-
- Neutral. Waggers (talk) 13:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose It's not part of the Irish sea. BastunBaStun not BaTsun 13:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Option 3 - North Channel (North Sea)
- Option 4 - North Channel (Scotland and Northern Ireland)
-
- oppose as it uses political terminology to describe a geographical feature where an alternative exists
- oppose Too wordy. Waggers (talk) 13:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- neutral Accurate, but otherwise as per, er, Bardcom? (The top comment) BastunBaStun not BaTsun 13:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Option 5 - North Channel (Irish Sea and North Atlantic Ocean)
- Option 6 - North Channel (British Isles)
-
- support - it says what it is, it's the status quo, and (so far) no reason has been given for why this is in any way incorrect
- oppose Not precise. Does it separate the BI from the mainland? Or from Scandinavia? BastunBaStun not BaTsun 13:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support Counter-revolutionary (talk) 14:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- oppose - Not precise as per Bastun Bardcom (talk) 14:51, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Option 7 - North Channel (Europe)
[edit] Discussion
Even though Waggers has reverted to the earlier incorrect{{cn term, he was correct in noting that (Britain and Ireland) is wrong in any case. The correct terminology should have been (Great Britain and Ireland). I'm a firm supporter of using accurate terminology where possible. The North Channel can either be described in relation to the two land masses it flows between, or can be described as linking to bodies of water. Encyclopedia Brittania opens the description with strait linking the Irish Sea with the North Atlantic Ocean, so that lends some weight to option 5. I propose to close the poll in 3 days - Sunday 30th March. Bardcom (talk) 12:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- The only other article with the name North Channel relates to Canada (although the dab page also links to the Canal du Nord. Therefore, if North Channel (British Isles) is unacceptable as a form of disambiguation (and so far no reason has been put forward to support that notion), North Channel (Europe) is also available. Note that nowhere in the naming conventions or disambiguation guidelines is any mention made of needing to specify which land masses, or other bodies of water, a channel runs between. This idea is not in keeping with the rest of the project and is, frankly, more than a little strange. Waggers (talk) 13:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment As a point of fact on Waggers opinion, the other article refers to Ontario, not Canada, and it refers to a channel of water that flows along the Ontario coastline. You make some vague accusations about "not in keeping with the rest of the project" and "more than a little strange" - care to explain? Bardcom (talk) 14:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Does North Channel (Ontario) separate Ontario from the rest of Canada, or from anywhere else? No, that North Channel is within Ontario, just like this North Channel within the British Isles; it's perfectly accurate, and maintains consistency across Wikipedia. Waggers (talk) 14:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's as correct as saying (Europe). (GB & I) is more precise. Bardcom (talk) 14:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Surely "British Isles" is just as precise as "Ontario". Why this attempt to fix something that isn't broken? Waggers (talk) 15:11, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's as correct as saying (Europe). (GB & I) is more precise. Bardcom (talk) 14:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Does North Channel (Ontario) separate Ontario from the rest of Canada, or from anywhere else? No, that North Channel is within Ontario, just like this North Channel within the British Isles; it's perfectly accurate, and maintains consistency across Wikipedia. Waggers (talk) 14:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment As a point of fact on Waggers opinion, the other article refers to Ontario, not Canada, and it refers to a channel of water that flows along the Ontario coastline. You make some vague accusations about "not in keeping with the rest of the project" and "more than a little strange" - care to explain? Bardcom (talk) 14:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bardcom and the British Isles
I wouldn't even want to count the number of pages where Bardcom has deleted or replaced the word British Isles. This is ridiculous.
[edit] Swapping order of Irish and Scottish Gaelic
An editor swapped the order of these terms in the lead paragraph. Is there a reason behind this edit? Please explain. --Bardcom (talk) 09:13, 1 May 2008 (UTC)