Talk:Norsefire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Comics This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and provide comments here.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Secretary of Defense

The film briefly mentions that Adam Sutler was the Secretary of Defense before Norsefire was elected to Parliament. I suppose this explains how he gained so much political backing from the people, as his military and decisions helped to "calm the chaos".


—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.255.91.32 (talk) 16:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Comic And Film

It is my belif that the comic's ideas should be more important than the films Slayerx675 17:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

It is my belif that the films ideas should be more important than the comic's ~ sumguy

It is my belif that both are of equal value. They tread along the same basic path and themes. And the word is "belief.

just as importantly. does anyone know the cooralation between the norsefire flag and the american lung assocication?

They both use the Cross of Lorraine? --Foot Dragoon 00:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] CoE

"They began to sink their influence into the Church of England, promoting and demoting members of the clergy as they saw fit." - The British Prime Minister already has some say over bishops. --MacRusgail 16:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Flag

It's probably worth pointing out that the Norsefire flag shown on this article is sideways when compared to every version of it (both in flag and symbol) in the film, and the concept art from V for Vendetta, from Script to Film --Jittery Joe 16:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

What is the significance of saying that the flag forms an H on its side? Robert 23:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] V for Vendetta Template

I'm removing this template from all its articles:

Which, I agree, is fairly provocative. However, I don't see how "V for Vendetta" deserves this on its own, or what useful information it provides. Surely the links in the articles are sufficient? If people want to revert my changes, that's fine by me. But please reply to this post so we can get a discussion started. At the moment I see no reason why the template should exist. Maccy69 13:47, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

I've reverted my previous edit and requested a template deletion instead, see below. Maccy69 17:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:V for Vendetta

Template:V for Vendetta has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Maccy69 17:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Warrior19.jpg

Image:Warrior19.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Fbnfvv.png

Image:Fbnfvv.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)