From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Frank Lasee. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article must include proper sources. Thank you. Arthurrh (talk) 18:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Frank Lasee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Arthurrh 17:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Frank Lasee, you will be blocked from editing. Please don't intentionally add invalid categories to a user to push a particular POV Arthurrh 19:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
You have been
indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with
Wikipedia's blocking policy for
Sockpuppetry, sock of banned user.. If you believe this block is unjustified you may
contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|
your reason here}} below.
SQLQuery me! 19:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I don't know what the heck 'sockpuppetry' is, but I didn't do it."
Decline reason: "WP:SOCK, and you clearly did. — Yamla 20:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "is there any proof here, or is this 'hearing' based entirely on speculation, conjecture and voodoo?"
Decline reason: "Checkuser confirmed. Please don't lie to us. —-Deskana (talk) 22:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
