Noel Ignatiev

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 This article needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2007)

Noel Ignatiev is an American history professor at the Massachusetts College of Art best known for his call to "abolish" the white race. Ignatiev is the co-founder and co-editor of the journal Race Traitor and the New Abolitionist Society. He also has written a book on antebellum northern racism against Irish immigrants, How the Irish Became White.

Contents

[edit] Career

[edit] Biography

Ignatiev's parents were Jewish immigrants from Russia. He attended the University of Pennsylvania but dropped out after three years. He worked in a steel mill in Chicago and in factories manufacturing farm equipment and electrical parts for two decades. Ignatiev was a Marxist activist and helped organize strikes and protests by the predominantly black work force at the steel mill. He was laid off from the steel mill in 1984, a year after he was arrested on charges of throwing a paint bomb at a strike-breaker's car.[1]

Ignatiev set up Marxist discussion groups in the early 1980s. In 1985, Mr. Ignatiev was accepted to the Harvard Graduate School of Education without an undergraduate degree. After earning his master's, he joined the Harvard faculty as a lecturer and worked toward a doctorate in U.S. history.

Noel Ignatiev first became politically active in Students for a Democratic Society. When that organization split, Ignatiev became part of the Third-worldist and Maoist New Communist Movement, forming the group Sojourner Truth Organization in 1970. Unlike other groups in the New Communist Movement, the STO and Ignatiev were also heavily influenced by the ideas of C.L.R. James.

Ignatiev was a graduate student at Harvard University where he earned his Ph.D. in 1995. He taught courses there before moving to the Massachusetts College of Art, where he currently teaches. His academic work is linked to his call to "abolish" the white race, a controversial slogan whose meaning is not always agreed upon by those who debate his work. His dissertation, published by Routledge as the book How the Irish Became White, was advised by prominent social historian of American race and ethnicity Stephan Thernstrom. Ignatiev is the co-founder and co-editor of the journal Race Traitor and the New Abolitionist Society.

[edit] Harvard Controversy

From 1986 until 1992, Ignatiev served as a tutor for Dunster House at Harvard University (ie., as an academic advisor for the undergraduate students that lived in Dunster). In the spring of 1992, Ignatiev vocally objected to the placement of a toaster in the Dunster House dining hall designated for kosher use only, and demanded that it be removed or paid for by private funds. In a subsequent letter to the Harvard student newspaper, the Harvard Crimson, Ignatiev stated that "I regard anti-Semitism, like all forms of religious, ethnic and racial bigotry, as a crime against humanity and whoever calls me an anti-Semite will face a libel suit."[citation needed]

Dunster House subsequently refused to renew Ignatiev's contract, stating that his conduct was "unbecoming of a Harvard tutor." Dunster co-master Hetty Liem said it was the job of a tutor "to foster a sense of community and tolerance and to serve as a role model for the students," and that Ignatiev had not been able to do this. Liem also alleged that Ignatiev had tried to "impress his own beliefs on others", and to "single-handedly and unilaterally demand reversal of a house policy". He added that Ignatiev could have held a roundtable discussion to address the issue, but instead acted like "a bull charging in a shop".

[edit] Ideas

[edit] Views of race

Ignatiev is part of a wide consensus of social scientists and geneticists of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries who view race distinctions and race itself as a social construct, not a scientific reality. In his study of Irish immigrants in the nineteenth-century United States, Ignatiev recounts the Irish triumph over nativism and shows how that triumph marked the incorporation of the Irish into the dominant group of American society. Ignatiev asserts that the Irish were not initially accepted by native-born Americans of Anglo-Saxon descent as white. He claims that only through their own violence against free blacks and support of slavery did the Irish gain acceptance as white. Ignatiev and other scholars of the field define whiteness as the access to white privilege, which according to Ignatiev gains people perceived to have "white" skin admission to certain neighborhoods, schools, and jobs. In the nineteenth century it was strongly associated with political power, especially suffrage.

Ignatiev states that attempts to give race a biological foundation have only led to absurdities, as in the common example that a white woman could give birth to a black child, but a black woman could never give birth to a white child. Ignatiev asserts that the only logical explanation for this notion is that people are members of different racial categories because society assigns people to these categories.

[edit] The "New Abolition" and "White Race"

Ignatiev's academic views of race are not necessarily as controversial as his statements about the abolition of the white race, by which he means the abolition of white privilege and race identity. Ignatiev's web site and publication Race Traitor, display the motto "treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity".

In an interview with Danny Postel on in 1996, Ignatiev stated:

“ Either the fascists are going to lead people into a poor white man's revolution, which would open the doors to horrors beyond anything that we've seen--from which I do not exclude Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. Or these people are going to say: To hell with this. We do not wish to be white. We wish to recognize that other people, those fighting hardest against the injustices of this society, the most extreme victims of it--the black youth--who are doing their best to resist what American society is doing to them: therein lie our closest potential allies. In other words, we are not going to be white anymore. We're going to take a chance on being free. ”

A year later at a conference at Berkeley, California, Ignatiev stated, "Whiteness is not a culture... Whiteness has nothing to do with culture and everything to do with social position. It is nothing but a reflection of privilege, and exists for no reason other than to defend it." Also, "When it comes to abolishing the white race, the task is not to win over more whites to oppose 'racism'; there are 'anti-racists' enough already to do the job."[citation needed]

In September of 2002, Ignatiev was quoted by VDARE's editor Paul Craig Roberts as having stated:

“ The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists. Make no mistake about it, we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed - not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed. ”

[edit] Criticisms

His critics within social constructionist circles regard him as being overly ideological and inflammatory and criticise him for wanting to confront the "problem" of 'whiteness' in society without actually trying to understand it [1].

[edit] Works Published

[edit] References

  1. ^ Harvard professor argues for 'abolishing' white race by Joyce Howard Price - Washington Times, September 4, 2002

[edit] See also

[edit] External links