Talk:Nochiya Tribe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nochiya Tribe is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
August 19, 2006 Featured article candidate Not promoted
WikiProject Assyria This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, or visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contents

[edit] old comments

Please note that this article is a rewritten version of Shamezdin, which is now a redirect. Here is the history of the old page and here the last pre-rewrite version. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 23:39, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Villages

Does anybody know how many villages where located in the Region of Shamizdin and what their names were??? --A2raya07 01:20, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merge

Just came across this site by coincidence. Why is it a independent article? Why not merge it with the Semdinli-article? - the info in this article seem to fit a coming historical paragraph for Semdinli. Bertilvidet 20:43, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

  • It is more commonly known as Nochiya, no one knows it as Semdinli--71.194.56.87 22:31, 12 March 2006

[edit] Refrences

Most information for this article was collected by Nenif Matran Hariri, who was the former Minister of Religious Affairs in Iraq's Kurdistan Regional Government. --A2raya07 18:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

In that case, cite the sources. The article has a very bad encyclopedic tone. I am sorry to say that editors of this article were not aware of how to use neutral and formal tone. Besides that, there are many claims here for which many sources are lacking. Please be aware that Wikipedia is not a place to promote research, it is only a place to compile research that has already been done. Failure to follow this policy is known as original research. It doesn't matter who compiled what, there are simply not enough impartial and serious sources to back up the claims of this article. You have substituted the same reference to all the fact tags.. Aside from the fact that it is not accessible and the fact that it is still impartial, the whole article still stands on three sources, two of which are websites and one magazine that is not accessible from the Internet, and as such lacking means of verification. The OR tag will stay.. Please provide the Internet link for the magazine that you cited ten times.. Baristarim 18:34, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
This page looks like it was copied and pasted from another publication, and therefore could be a copyright violation.
+There are many weasel words, some of the claims are not substantiated at all, and there are all sorts of weird claims. "the treacherous assasination of .." - according to whom?
As I said, this page looks like it is a copyvio, and if that's the case most of the contents should be deleted. I explained to your for months that: you shouldn't have created so many articles about non-existent/unofficial subdistricts/villages. It took me ages to correctly sort them out. It is still not getting through that this article needs more sources and it needs to be copy-edited to make it NPOV and remove all sorts of weasel words - that is, if, it is not a copy-vio to begin with. I have made plenty of notes, and all that you are saying is "don't be childish" in your edit summaries. Please watch for civility as well and refrain from calling other editors "childish". So, are there other sources? Will there be a copy-edit? And is this a copy-vio or not? Baristarim 22:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)


Baristarim the kid is researching his ancestors history not claiming it, not making it, sources could be live people, un posted books articles,he is taling it to the world, for god sack he is a high school kid ,American born he is not taking turkey away from you, why you are making so much fuss about, respect his effort and hard work. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.80.81.205 (talk) 14:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC).