User talk:Noboyo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Image:Jan Fischer.jpg. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 21:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Jan_Fischer.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Jan_Fischer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:04, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mamalillawould.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Mamalillawould.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 17:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Ditto for Image:Noa.jpg. --Geniac (talk) 17:15, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Deleting Reference On Kelly Rowland Work Page

I was just wondering why you decided that it was best to edit out the citation for reference number 15. (This is the citation I am talking about: Ultratop. ultratop.be. Retrieved on 2008-05-17.) As you can see on the current page, there is an error on reference 15 and the citation was placed there to fix the error.

Therefore, if you could tell me why you thought it was better to leave the error there (instead of having the error fixed by placing the correct citation) I would greatly appreciate it. I ask this because I wouldn't want to place the citation back into the article if you were just going to just delete again.

JoyaOscura (talk) 06:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Private Mitteilung

Hallo,

ich wollte dich einmal privat anschreiben, doch leider hast du keine E-Mail-Adresse hinterlegt. So kann ich dich leider nicht kontaktieren. Was soll ich tun? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.67.126.143 (talk) 14:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:No Angels ESC 2008.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:No Angels ESC 2008.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bib (talk) 11:48, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] "Hot Summer" by Monrose is NOT a House music song!

You are vandalizing an otherwise accurate list! (Mirror Ball 15:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC))

[edit] Your tone isn't particularly civil, and your info isn't factual

"By the way: You are vandalizing, cause it's what Senna said in an interview (once again: Check sources). - Noboyo" -- Taken from Mmalone's talk board (posted by Noboyo)...

Senna is a member of the group, but not necessarily an authority on the topic! (Mirror Ball 16:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC))

I'm discussing the matter with Mwmalone (talk · contribs) on his talk page, but I'd also ask that you try to assume good faith with regard to Mwmalone; even if his edits appear to be vandalism, some benefit of the doubt may be in order. I've also asked Mwmalone to do the same (assume good faith) with regard to your edits. I'm hoping this can be discussed without further edit warring, and I'd invite you to raise your points at talk:Hot Summer (song). Thanks, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 16:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Hanne Sorvaag

A tag has been placed on Hanne Sorvaag, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Brandy-(everything i do) i do it for you s.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Brandy-(everything i do) i do it for you s.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed deletion of List of No Angels songs

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of No Angels songs, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? TN‑X-Man 14:25, 7 June 2008 (UTC)