From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
- If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
|
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
Mid |
This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
|
Food and drink task list: |
|
|
|
Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
- Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Food, Bread, Beef, Curry, Drink, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yoghurt, Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom)
- Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: , Italian cuisine, Cuisine of the Thirteen Colonies, Coffee, Milk, Pasta, French cuisine, Chocolate
- Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Burger King
- Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
- Get rid of Trivia sections in articles you are working on.
- Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner to food and drink related articles to help bring them to members attention. It could encourage new members to the project too.
- Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of food
- Review articles currently up for GA status: Burger King legal issues, Chocolate
- Review articles currently up for FA status: Butter
|
|
|
[edit] Significance of Hong Kong section?
Does this article need an entire section dedicated to one negative review? It seems rather POV to elevate one opinion like that. --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 13:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
"Does this article need an entire section dedicated to one negative review?" In my humble opinion, the review section allows for more reviews (both good and bad) to be added. It is rather unfortunate that there is only one review which at the moment is a negative review about the Hong Kong branch. I think it is more appropriate to *add* more reviews (both good and bad) about the different branches as oppose to removing the whole section. Just my 2 cents. – Kempton "Ideas are the currency of the future." - a quote by Kevin Roberts 18:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
As a follow up comment re the negative Hong Kong NOBU reviews. Take the entry for the economist Steven_N._S._Cheung for example. I admire his economics insight very much and it pains me to see more than 1/3 of his entry is dominated by his legal troubles instead of discussion about his Economics ideas. Of course, I would rather not see those legal troubles dominating the entry but I will not delete those troubles. Instead, I hope Wikipedia users (including myself) can add more meat to main entry. Again, just my 2 cents. And I can be wrong. – Kempton "Ideas are the currency of the future." - a quote by Kevin Roberts 15:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 21:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)