Talk:No wandering domain theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Systems (Rated Stub-Class)

Systems science Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to Systems science.

Systems rating:

Stub Class

Mid importance

Field: Dynamical systems

Please update this rating as the article progresses, or if the rating is inaccurate. Please also add comments to suggest improvements to the article.

[edit] Not yet

Im not really great yet with the wiki syntax, but I belive that this theorem is very important in this field, and is one of the most important proofs in complex dynamics. Paxinum 20:35, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

OK, but the mathematician who proved it (Dennis Sulivan) already had a wikipedia article. So I put the link to that page, and added some relevant info. I will also redirect the D. Sullivan page to Dennis Sullivan, and move the content there. Hope this will do it. Turgidson 03:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I realized that U must be a component of the Fatou set, but I have trouble finding a precise definition; Complex Dynamics by Carleson & Gamelin have the full proof of the theorem, but I have trouble finding the definition of component, which is one reason that I started this article, I wanted to know how to propely use it.

Oh, and I would like to use $f k$ instead of $f k$ , this is the notation used in Iteration of Rational Functions, by Beardon, and in Complex dynamics. The reason is that the derivative $f' k$ is easier to denote with subscripted k.

Paxinum 17:01, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough (about the notation), especially since you have now explained it. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 03:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC)