Talk:No god but God

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Books Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the No god but God article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Contents 1 Vandalism 2 No god but God 3 Two Senses of Jehad 4 Fair use rationale for Image:Ngbg.jpg

[edit] Vandalism

When we put in the stub for 'Islamic Book Stub' as shown below, it alto matically puts this in:

"Resale Zahabia. It is a letter from Imam Jaffer sadeq to Mamoon ur rashid ,regardin way of life and special recipes and guodelines the copy is available in some of pakistans book shopes . resurch is required"

Why?

Robert C Prenic 14:31, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No god but God

• 1 This concept is arguably the essence of Islam.
• 2 It clearly brings to mind the First of the Ten Commandments of the Jewish and Christian Scriptures.
• 3 Said 1st commandment is: "I am that I am, though shall not have any other god before me."
• 4 Accordingly, it provides the bridge among the three peoples: Jews, Christians, and Moslems. It clearly shows a common belief in the Essential Oneness of God.
• 5 Its young Muslim Iranian author tries to account for the current Dialogue within the Moslim World. And effort to deminish this article buy merging it under another category will merely prove that Noam Chomsky, a World-class philosopher, is correct regarding the exercise of Power in this Information age. I have recently purchased the book, and intend to make a contribution her.
• 6 However, I am currently in the midst of a Major Editors War, among a (single) handful of editers, who are disrupting my ability to perform my services as well as I can.
• 7 I urge all editors who have read this book to report here and support my desire that this excellent book will receive its appropriate independed place of its own. --Ludvikus 20:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Two Senses of Jehad

• This book has, in my opinion, an extremely timely discussion of the concept of Jihad in the world today.

• As my Moslem brothers and sisters know, as well as among those who know, there are two senses of this fundamental notion. One is the one of the terrorists, into which I will not go now.

• The other is the one most Moslems believe in. In English, the closest word is Struggle. And it means, of course, among those who know, a Spiritual struggle - an obligation every Muslem has.

• The young author reports on Iran after his recent return, and on the current debate.

• As I am now in a Wikipedia Editor Struggle myself, I ask that those who know report on the book here and make this a wonderful and beautiful informative article of the highest Wikipedia standards. There is no god but God. Peace. --Ludvikus 20:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ngbg.jpg

Image:Ngbg.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)