Talk:No Future for You

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This Buffyverse-related article is part of WikiProject Buffyverse, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Buffy, Angel & the rest of the Buffyverse. You can help! Visit the project page, episode checklist or discuss an article at the project talk-page.

Buffy Portal

Contents 1 Lady Genevieve Savidge?? 2 dialect error 3 Fair use rationale for Image:Faith and faith compare.jpg 4 Fair use rationale for Image:NoFutureCover.jpg 5 Writing and artwork 6 Summary 7 Grammar in the Summaries

[edit] Lady Genevieve Savidge??

Who is she, I'm interested if she's real. Has she been confirmed to be in the arc...>If so the cite where you got it.---User:Smartjoe299

I've certainly never heard of her, which isn't to say it's inaccurate, I suppose. Jeff-El 16:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I found a solicitation and referenced it accordingly. Jeff-El 16:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] dialect error

Giles sends Faith to a "fancy dress party" which in England means a costume party. For Faith her formal gown is a costume, but ... —Tamfang 21:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Faith and faith compare.jpg

Image:Faith and faith compare.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:NoFutureCover.jpg

Image:NoFutureCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Writing and artwork

Are there any sources for the statements that writing and artwork refer to specific aspects of pop culture such as the Sex Pistols, Alan Moore or Escape from New York? I suspect whoever put these in is correct, but that doesn't mean it should go in without verification. Hobson 00:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Summary

It's far too indepth. What we have here breaks guidelines. It needs condensing. A lot. ~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 20:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I disagree, remember this article concerns 4 seperate comic issues (1,2,3,4). - Don't have an account to sign in with. Ryan1711 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.158.186.123 (talk) 00:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Grammar in the Summaries

The way the sentences are strung together is unimpressive and very run-on. This creates a very jagged picture for our readers. I move for a complete rewrite... I will give whomever wrote the summary 72 hours to correct the mistakes, but if it is not done, I myself will personally rectify this to be more eloquent. Domestibot (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Domestibot