User talk:Nivix

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Note: I usually reply here unless you tell me otherwise.

Contents

[edit] Help

Will you please revert Vince Vaughn? I couldn't do rvv because of my security reason. Thank you. Oda Mari 17:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I saw the rv on recent change page. Oda Mari 17:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
No problem. — Nivix talk 17:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] President of the United States

Hi. Thanks for your revision of the vandalism; unfortunately, there was vandalism by another user earlier, and when you reverted, you kept the earlier vandalism. It's a good idea when reverting to check to make sure there aren't any other vandalism edits to revert. One way to tell (sometimes) is if a number of edits were made in a row to an article by IP addresses that do not include descriptions of the edits. Thanks again. Info999 21:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I'll be more thorough in the future. Thanks for notifying me. — Nivix talk 21:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Revert Please?

Will you please revert Artificial intelligence. I've already used up my three for the day. --Amaraiel 14:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Nevermind. Already done. --Amaraiel 14:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
The three-revert rule is only restricting you from making more than three reverts on a single article. I don't see that you have done any reverts in the past 24 hours on that article, so I would say that you are safe to proceed if the vandal returns. — Nivix talk 14:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
    • I must have misunderstood it then. Thanks! --Amaraiel 14:59, 6 September 2007 (UTC)


The comments you deleted are true. both the comment about Robin Quivers and Artie Lang can be substantiated by a February 2006 broadcast of The Howard Stern show. I resent your accusation of vandalism. Here's another verifiable Fact.... You Suck! You Wikipedia Nazi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.9.240.19 (talk) 18:38, September 6, 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Help, Pizza Grandiosa

I've now added a link from the online edition of the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet, that explains more about the doubt-issue.

And I've removed any references to message-boards what so ever.

So there should now be six references to reliable sources confirming the information in the section.

So it would be very fine if you had the oppertunity to have a look at this.

Because I can't see any thing in the section, which isn't properly documented.

So I hope you have the chance to have a look at this!

Thanks in advance!

[edit] Grandiosa

I note that you have previously reverted edits to Grandiosa, citing original research, FUD etc. I too share your concerns about these edits, and like you have seen my attempts to remove them immediately overridden. I have started a thread in the article's talk page for discussion if you are interested. Ros0709 11:59, 2 December 2007 (UTC)