Talk:NiSource
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Too short
While the history section contains a fairly detailed chronology, the rest of the article contains very little information. Overall, this article doesn't have enough information to be especially useful. Therefore, I have marked this article as a stub.
Furthermore, I don't understand why there is a chronology of Columbia Gas on this page. I would think that that should be under the Columbia Gas article, not the NiSource article. Yes, I know they're a subsidiary, but it seems really disconnected from the article, especially as the article is currently written. Furthermore, since Columbia Gas is deemed worthy of a separate entry, users interested in Columbia Gas' chronology can easily consult that entry. Therefore, I also recommend that that section be moved to the Columbia Gas entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.228.245.174 (talk) 01:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC)