Talk:Nik Radev

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
Flag
Portal
Nik Radev is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime.

[edit] Information missing

The link to this article from the general Melbourne Gangland page refers to Radev's killer being the notorious Chopper Read, and yet this article bore no mention. I have now included this info.

Exemplar sententia 13:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

I take it back. I thought it sounded a little off, so i looked into it, and found no such incrimination anywhere. Police never actually identified a killer, although a few possibles were named. Falsities removed from this article and main article.

Exemplar sententia 13:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

I have removed the Australian Crime Writer's Association" link from the Sources section (and since it was the only entry therein, the section itself, too) as it is a dead link. I couldn't find a similar page anywhere on the web, so i cannot replace it.

Exemplar sententia 03:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 00:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)