User talk:Nihiltres/Archive-17

[edit] Quotes

Thank you. Admittedly one of my shortcomings is complex math, so while you lost me in the math, I do understand replace {{#expr:({{CURRENTMINUTE}}*3)/20 round 0}} with {{#expr:({{CURRENTMINUTE}}-1.5)/3 round 0}} lol So, currently there's 45 quotes in the pool it pulls from. So what is the code to make it pull from 60 quotes? That way as we add to it, it won't be a problem up to 60. Thanks for your help. -- ALLSTAR ECHO 22:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Replied on user talk where I initially posted. Nihiltres^(t.l) 23:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Thanks for your help in solving our LGBT Quotes dilemma. -- ALLSTAR ECHO 23:28, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A salt

Just so you know, I fixed this salt of yours. Somehow, there was a very tiny error on the protected titles list that made the wrong page be protected. It was re-requested at RFPP for it to be salted. Acalamari 01:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Ah, thanks. I was afraid something like that might happen in a wierd, long title. Nihiltres^(t.l) 02:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) Acalamari 02:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVII - October 2007

The October 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 09:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding 69.132.18.154‎ spamming

Hi, I am at 3RR and I was not aware that I had to post warnings on spammer's page with each revert. I did warn him in an edit summary of each revert though as can be seen here. He _is_ engaged in a blatant external link spamming. What's the best course of action given the circuimstances ? Thanks, Alex Pankratov 04:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

It's good form to warn with each revert. I removed the AIV report on the basis that a block seems unnecessary at this point, since the user appeared to have stopped. As I was writing this, however, I checked again and they're continuing, so I'll give a more serious warning and then block if necessary. Nihiltres^(t.l) 04:48, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Alex Pankratov 05:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Bump Alex Pankratov 19:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Bang! Nihiltres^(t.l) 20:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My recent RfA

Thank you for supporting my RfA, which unfortunately didn't succeed. The majority of the opposes stated that I needed more experience in the main namespace and Wikipedia namespace, so that is what I will do. I will go for another RfA in two month's time and I hope you will be able to support me then as well. If you have any other comments for me or wish to be notified when I go for another RfA, please leave them on my talk page. If you wish to nominate me for my next RfA, please wait until it has been two months. Thanks again for participating in my RfA! -- Cobi^(t|c|b|cn) 01:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

It should succeed next time. Good luck, :) Nihiltres^(t.l) 01:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] deletion of Emtek page

Nihiltres, I have just become aware that the page, Emtek, that I posted has been deleted for lack of notability. I have read the guidelines and i would like to try rewriting the page. Would you be so kind as to send me the deleted text. Thanks Oct. 11, 2007 TomMillar 1 01:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)TomMillar 1

Certainly, I'll move it to your (currently nonexistent) userpage if it isn't otherwise a problem. Nihiltres^(t.l) 01:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Y Done Nihiltres^(t.l) 02:01, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! TomMillar 1 16:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)TomMillar 1

[edit] RfA Thanks

Dear Nihiltres, ______ __ __ __ /\__ _\/\ \ /\ \ /\ \ \/_/\ \/\ \ \___ __ ___\ \ \/'\ __ __ ___ __ __\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ `\ /'__`\ /' _ `\ \ , < /\ \/\ \ / __`\/\ \/\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \/\ \_\.\_/\ \/\ \ \ \\`\\ \ \_\ \/\ \_\ \ \ \_\ \\ \_\ \ \_\ \ \_\ \_\ \__/.\_\ \_\ \_\ \_\ \_\/`____ \ \____/\ \____/ \/\_\ \/_/ \/_/\/_/\/__/\/_/\/_/\/_/\/_/\/_/`/___/> \/___/ \/___/ \/_/ /\___/ \/__/ For your contribution to My RfA, which passed with 8000 Supports, 2 Neutrals and no opposes. The standards and dedication of the English Wikipeidan Administrators is excellent and I am privileged to stand among them. Thankyou for putting you trust in me, I'll not see it abused. And now, I will dance naked around a fire. Party at my place! Cheers! Dfrg.msc 09:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC) Expand for picture....

[edit] Ah.. stupid

That skipped my mind, in fact I think I supported that bot. Yes, that would save both taggers and admins a lot of work. Thanks again! Phgao 15:31, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Fightingforwhatsright

This user is a sockpuppet of Creepy Crawler (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) based on its contributions (another sock, UniversalHero (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log), made the exact same edits last night) and behavior (undoing edits and marking them as minor). Shouldn't this be an indef rather than a 24-hour block? -Jéské^{(v^_^v)} 03:43, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

I didn't recognize the sock, so I made a general block. I'll change the block to indef now that I know for sure it's a sock. Thanks! Nihiltres^(t.l) 03:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Null perspiration. I've requested a semi-prot on the articles hit so far tonight and last night; I only got involved when I noticed UniversalHero on the new users list starting to systematically undo User:FisherQueen's edits. -Jéské^{(v^_^v)} 04:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)