Talk:Nihonga

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? Class: This article has not been assigned a class according to the assessment scale.
Socrates This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a project to improve all Japan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Japan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

I have genuine reservations about the assertion that Nihonga is a watercolor technique. I checked the watercolor site, and was even more convinced that the assertion would lead to greater confusion than elucidation. This brings me to an even greater conflict I see with many of the art painting related articles. The emphasis on solvents ie: water, oil, etc. from the standpoint of either artist or manufacturer is less a way of categorizing mediums than the binder from which paints are made. Might I suggest categorizing paints by binder ie: egg tempera, polymer based tempera, encaustic, oil, acrylic, watercolor (gum arabic), animal glues (nihonga etc.), magna, fresco (buon fresco, a secco) etc. At this point, materials are lumped into the categories based on their water soluble capabilities, which would somehow shelve watercolor with fresco and egg tempera and magna. Please, I'd like some feedback. I'm averse to making changes to an otherwise excellent article. Rawkcuf (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Rawkcuf.


I changed the reference to gold and silver foil to gold and silver leaf. (a common mistake- the difference being in thickness...)

I suggest a change in the remark that the portrayal of plants and animals are generally done without outlines. That may be a difficult assertion to back up in light of the long tradition of outlines coming from the kano school.Rawkcuf (talk) 14:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Rawkcuf.