User talk:Niemeyerstein en

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Niemeyerstein en, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ewlyahoocom (talk • contribs) 00:05, November 13, 2007

Contents

[edit] Welcome, and advice

Thanks very much for your work on Real time locating standards and Real time locating; it's not my field, but I agree that it's important for Wikipedia to be up-to-date on these standards. However, it's likely that Real time locating standards is going to be nominated for deletion at some point unless you give more sources...and adding more words to the article only means that more needs to be sourced, so I suggest you stop working on the article and start working on the sources. The ISO's website is certainly a source...but give the url of the pages that contain information that supports what you say in the article, not the home page. And one source is not nearly good enough, given the amount of information you give in the article. So ... keep up the good work, but list your reliable sources before you write the article, not after, or you will start attracting attention that you don't want to attract. (I'm speaking from experience.) I'll be happy to help, just ask. - Dan Dank55 (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Real time locating has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Abrech (talk) 09:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Locating engine

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Locating engine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 10:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Locating engine

An editor has nominated Locating engine, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locating engine and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Wi-Fi. Thank you. Hello - The changes you made to this article are welcome. They were, though, very intensive, and require an edit summary to inform other editors of your changes. This is a key principle in building this encyclopedia. The scope of the contributors is global; using the edit summary is done out of respect for fellow editors. Cheers. E_dog95 Hi 19:14, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Real-time location articles

Hi Niemeyerstein en, After I added some suggestions to these articles, I am now confused. It appears that after that, you have edited unrelated articles I have worked on. Would you like to talk to me so that I can understand? Thank you, Widefox (talk) 10:17, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I have reviewed all of your edits to these articles...

[edit] Preimplantation genetic haplotyping

I have reverted your edit [1] as I these are covered in the article referenced. If you do not agree, please let me know. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Schmidt Sting Pain Index

This edit [2] is not justified, and is already covered by the tag. I have reverted. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Starr sting pain scale

The edit [3] helped me put the original ref in, as well as the book ref - thank you. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pain scale

fair enough. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Petname

This edit [4] was reverted by someone else. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Memory Type Range Registers

The 3 edits were not useful and were reverted. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dolorimeter

These 2 edits were not useful and were reverted. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Scoville scale

Did not agree - the edit was reverted. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] summary

Although you are free and entitled to edit any articles in WP, I cannot explain why you have chosen to edit these particular articles right after I have commented on the (Real-time location) articles. Please could you explain this, as it makes me feel slightly uncomfortable. Widefox (talk) 11:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)