Talk:Nieves Mathews
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group. | ||
 |
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
WHY NO MENTION OF JAVIER SOLANA'S FATHER???? by anon in article, SqueakBox 05:06, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
195.235.227.10 (talk) 23:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC) She is not Javier's mother, please check reference at:
This reference is good for Javier's life. Can somebody correct the mistake please?
- She is Solana's Mother and was married to his father as her first husband. Look at the geneology records [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdhunt (talk • contribs) 04:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Do we know where she grew up, ie in Spain or Scotland? as it would make an enormous difference, SqueakBox 20:55, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
195.235.227.10 (talk) 23:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC) She grew up between London, Madrid and somewhere in Switzerland (following where his father were working, check Salvador de Madariaga biography)
IS it possible to write something about her homophoby ? That would be interesting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.218.94.86 (talk) 19:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Because, you know, OSHO, the man who blessed his book and said to her to claim without proof, that Bacon was heterosexual, you know what was is mind about homosexuality ? This :
"If you want to be angry, be angry against Jesus Christ. Be angry against all the founders of religions. They all say, "Believe and you will be saved." And I say to you, "Believe and you are drowned." I say to you, "Doubt, because that is something that you have come with. Nature has provided you a method for inquiry. Doubt is a method of inquiry." In ten thousand years of religious history, religions have not contributed anything -- except AIDS, homosexuality, lesbianism, sadism, masochism, wars, discrimination -- all kinds of crimes: killing millions of people, burning living people. They are all based on belief. Science -- which is based on doubt -- has contributed within three hundred years everything from the smallest safety pin to the rocket that reaches to the moon. If you count the blessings that science has showered on you you will be surprised. Your clothes, your glasses, your watches, your health, your medicine, your food -- everything science has improved. Science has only been unsuccessful in improving you, because all the religions are sitting on your neck. I want you to get rid of all the religions and become a scientific seeker. "
That's a good example a scholarly neutrality, don't you think so ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.218.94.86 (talk) 20:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
