User talk:Nicolaususry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:MillerSchoolPhoto.png

Thanks for uploading Image:MillerSchoolPhoto.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nick—Contact/Contribs 03:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Sorry, this was my first upload and I did not know exactly how to do it. Best, (Nicolaususry 14:33, 30 October 2007 (UTC))

[edit] Removal of Assessment from Ferguson Center for the Arts

Hello. I saw that you had de-assessed Ferguson Center for the Arts by removing the "start" assessment from the WikiProject Virginia tag. Perhaps this was inadvertent. If not, please explain the reason for the deletion. WPV works hard to assess all articles related to Virginia. VirginiaProp 15:12, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

  • I put a response on your talk page stating my rationale. (Nicolaususry 14:32, 30 October 2007 (UTC))
  • This discussion continued on VirginiaProp's talk page. Here is a transcript of that discussion:
"I "de-assessed" the article because I extensively re-worked the article and felt that a review was warranted. I have now added references also. I apologize for the inconvenience. I am a relatively new user and this is my second major edit. Thanks for your help. Let me know if I do anything else wrong. Also feel free to remove this from your talk after you have read it. Thanks, (Nicolaususry 02:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC))"
"No problems. You didn't do anything wrong. Editing tags are useful and you should view them as help when you are creating an article. The tags make sure that the article gets put on a list that other WikiPedians can view of articles that need various types of assistance. Article creation is collabarative on WP and assistance can be very helpful. Most of us don't have the time or resources to create an article and take it to full GA status on our own. Also, tags are a way for an editor to mark something that needs to be improved, but for which he either doesn't have the time, the knowledge or the interest in improving himself. VirginiaProp 13:03, 30 October 2007 (UTC) "

[edit] Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies, conventions, and guidelines

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies, conventions, and guidelines before proposing drastic moves. Otherwise, you may end up looking like a troll (see WP:TROLL) and may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please see User:Ericsaindon2 for what happened to the last user I encountered who stubbornly persisted in submitting edits contrary to Wikipedia policy.

In particular, please review:

And also become familiar with the general content policies:

Thank you for your attention. --Coolcaesar 18:32, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

  • I have. We just seem to be at odds on this one. (Nicolaususry 14:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC))

[edit] Reminder floater

<div style="position: fixed; right:0; bottom:0; display:block; height:57px; width:365px;;-moz-opacity:.90;opacity:1"> <div style="position: relative; width: {{{1|400}}}px; height: {{{1|175}}}px; overflow: hidden"> <div style="position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px; z-index: 2"> {| id="toc" style="margin: 0 3em 0 3em;" ! align="left" style="background:#FF9933" width="100%" | DO NOT forget to sign at the end of messages by typing "~~~~", otherwise I may delete it. |} </div></div></div>

Here Wikidudeman (talk) 13:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Permission Granted for Removal -- Halloween Current Event Category

I already took care of it. Thanks. 132.170.7.254 00:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Grace Episcopal Church (Keswick, Virginia)

Thanks for creating the above article. However, I must advise you that you need to add text to the article to establish its notability. Just having an infobox is not enough. You might want to look at St. Paul's Episcopal Church ( Richmond, Virginia) for ideas. Also you might want to look at All Saints Episcopal Church, Waveland (Jensen Beach, Florida). Rub a Google search on the church and pay particular attention to the history given on the church's own website. Look for famous people or events associated with the church. The age and architecture of the building are also important. Your church is listed on the National Register of Historic Places at [1]] under the name of Grace Church, Cismont. That is very, very important. Best wishes. clariosophic (talk) 23:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC) P.S. I've added enough text to the article to show its notability and hopefully to avoid its quick deletion. clariosophic (talk) 00:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I think there's enough in the article now to protect it from being speedily deleted. Being on the National Register insures notability. Please remember that the article needs to have a neutral point of view and be factual with references either from books, websites, etc. It shouldn't be written like a press release or ad. Good luck on your exams. Best wishes. clariosophic (talk) 03:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)