Talk:Nicorette
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess. |
| Start | This page has been rated as Start-Class on the quality assessment scale |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance assessment scale |
[edit] Comment 1
Nicoderm does not equal Nicorette. These are entirely different technologies.
- Does someone with pharmeceutical knowledge of nicorette have an opinion on whether the claim that is does not work (or its effect is greatly reduced) by the consumption of tea, coffee, or alcohol?
- I am asking because I wonder if the story is (1) true (2) exaggerated or (3) false. I have been trying to quit smoking for a while and this story/rumour affects what I do. Seminumerical 03:48, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
I don't believe that Nicorette is different than any other nicotine gum (or chewing tobbacco for that matter). [1] has a comment about it. My non-chemist self belives that it has more to do with the was that the combination of mouth and nicotine react in the presence of acids. I could be wrong Syrrys 22:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] effectiveness of nicorette
Nicorette patch is effective also during consumption of tea, coffee or beer. It works. But you must keep the 3 steps: 15 mg patch- 1 month 10 mg patch- 1 month 5 mg patch - 1 month.
[edit] other comment
Nicorette is a brand of chewing gum designed as a smoking cessation aid - it is not the name of this category of products. I would call the overall category 'smoking cessation aids' or 'nicotine based smoking cessation aids' or something like that. Commit is the lozenge form of this product. These products are made with 'nicotine polacrilex' which is a purified (extracted or synthesized - I'm not sure) form of nicotine which is easy to adsorb through the mouth. I don't know much about what is in 'the patch' (nicoderm), but my comments below apply to 'the patch' as well.
These products ('nicotine based smoking cessation aids') work because they give a smoker their 'fix' of nicotine while they stop smoking. However, there is a behavioral and psychoactive component to nicotine addiction. Thus, smokers are addicted to nicotine but also have years of performing the physical acts of smoking which become habit - the hand to mouth ritual, the coffee/newspaper ritual, the regular break with co-workers, etc. Thus, smokers have to kick their nicotine addiction AND re-arrange the associated behaviors. These products work by letting smokers deal with re-arranging those behaviors while giving them a convenient format to slowly wean off the nicotine habit.
The relative importance of the psychopharmacological/behavioral aspects of the smoking experience may have something to do with how successful use of these 'nicotine based cessation aids' will be for an individual smoker.
If a smoker becomes addicted to one of these 'nicotine based smoking cessation aids' the net effect would probably be greatly beneficial for the smoker anyway. Nicotine has some cardiovascular problems (and is toxic in high doses) - it's main is evilness lies in it's addictive properties. I'm not even sure if nicotine itself is carcinogenic - but PLENTY of other stuff in tobacco is. So - developing a habit with nicotine gums/lozenges isn't great, but I would wager that it certainly safer than smoking. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.30.247.29 (talk) 00:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC).
