Talk:Nicky Oppenheimer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Nicky Oppenheimer is part of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Gemstones, Jewelry, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, people subpage.
WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry To-do: edit  Template:Gemology and Jewelry opentask

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

I think you will find that Jonathan was NOT adopted.

i find it amazing that the richest african is not even black...

Sorry to be ignorant but what is PPE? Far Canal 07:47, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

= Philosophy, Politics, and Economics; have amended article --mervyn 11:47, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

I find it a bit of a stretch to describe Nicky Opppenhiemer as Jewish if he is a member of the Anglican church and his father Harry Oppenheimer converted to Anglicanism. Even as an ethnic classification his Jewish descent is very diluted. Unless we are using Nazi classification. At the very least this would appear to be "original research". I suggest that this classification should be deleted from this article. Gerryfarm (talk) 22:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC)