Talk:Nick Bolkus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Portal	Nick Bolkus is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] NPOV issues

This article has some serious NPOV issues. This is someone with a quarter-century career of public service, and yet the vast majority of his article focuses on a single scandal. I recognize that this was the material that was most easily Googled, but the result is something that reads like an attack page with a stub wrapped around it. We desperately need to expand the remaining sections here. Phil Sandifer 15:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps someone could use [1] or [2] to do this expansion? Phil Sandifer 13:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 00:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Revertion of IP edit

I reverted this edit because it deleted critical material, which was well sourced (at least in regard to the scandal), without any attempt to improve it. To say that the scandal is only a small part of his life, should mean that the material should be added to redress the balance, not wholesale deletion of critical material (including the comment that he had only briefly worked as a lawyer, which it is hard to see as being as "semi-libelous").Grahamec 02:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)