Talk:Nicholas Knatchbull
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Ireland on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale. | |
[edit] Proposed merge
There is noting of note here that could not be contained within the Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma article. Anyone agree/disagree?--Vintagekits 16:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- There are separate articles for other relatively minor royals. I don't see any real reason why this one shouldn't have a separate article as well. His death is certainly notable, as is his status as a relative of the royal family. --Bookworm857158367 18:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- He is not notable himself according to WP:N and everything is contained within this article is already contained within the Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma article so there is no need for this one.--Vintagekits 18:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- In light of the many dreary articles established by yourself with reference to terrorists I think they prove that, as they are notable, the decent, innocent, victims of terrorism - especially when high-profile, are also notable. Quid pro quo and all that.--Counter-revolutionary 18:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- P.s the murders of Prince Louis & his family was not one, singular, murder; it was individuals who died, this requires individual articles.--Counter-revolutionary 18:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Firstly as per usual watch your tone please! Secondly, you are actually incorrect I could have resurect the Declan Arthurs article, the Gerry O'Callaghan article, the Séamus Donnelly articles which were merged to the Provisional IRA East Tyrone Brigade and I felt that as that article provided all the information already then there was no need to have them. Actually this article should be deleted and Nicholas Knatchbull should be a redirected to Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma.--Vintagekits 18:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- No it shouldn't. At the very worst there should be a separate arcticle for the incident, "The Massacre of the Mountbattens". --Counter-revolutionary 18:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- The whole article is almost word for word in the "Death" section of the Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma - what is there is this article that isnt in the Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma article? --Vintagekits 18:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- No it shouldn't. At the very worst there should be a separate arcticle for the incident, "The Massacre of the Mountbattens". --Counter-revolutionary 18:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Firstly as per usual watch your tone please! Secondly, you are actually incorrect I could have resurect the Declan Arthurs article, the Gerry O'Callaghan article, the Séamus Donnelly articles which were merged to the Provisional IRA East Tyrone Brigade and I felt that as that article provided all the information already then there was no need to have them. Actually this article should be deleted and Nicholas Knatchbull should be a redirected to Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma.--Vintagekits 18:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- He is not notable himself according to WP:N and everything is contained within this article is already contained within the Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma article so there is no need for this one.--Vintagekits 18:27, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- There are separate articles for other relatively minor royals. I don't see any real reason why this one shouldn't have a separate article as well. His death is certainly notable, as is his status as a relative of the royal family. --Bookworm857158367 18:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
He isn't the same person as his grand-father, an article about the incident is required and a title suggested above.--Counter-revolutionary 18:58, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well good luck with that article yeah. However, this person isnt notable and should be merged or redirected.--Vintagekits 19:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Right if you finally disagree with its merger then I am going to nominate it for deletion ok.--Vintagekits 23:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- The article says nothing about the poor child, except naming his relatives and stating when he died. I think that deletion is in order. His surviving brother, the Honorable Timothy Knatchbull,... now, has he done anything with his life that warrants an article? --Amandajm 08:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Wikipedia seems to have set a precedent that people can become notable by virtue of dying. See the countless articles created and/or contributed to by User:Vintagekits on IRA terrorists, for instance. --Counter-revolutionary 09:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- The article says nothing about the poor child, except naming his relatives and stating when he died. I think that deletion is in order. His surviving brother, the Honorable Timothy Knatchbull,... now, has he done anything with his life that warrants an article? --Amandajm 08:23, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Right if you finally disagree with its merger then I am going to nominate it for deletion ok.--Vintagekits 23:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
