From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
| WikiProject Buddhism (Rated Start-Class) |
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Ngo Dinh Nhu, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
|
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
|
|
[edit] Disputed Point
WTF? Where's the discussion on the disputed point? Otherwise it's not disputed. ABart26 13:48, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Citiations?
Olson is listed as a source in the notes, but his book isn't in the list of references. I'm just curious what book it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.167.252.202 (talk) 22:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hardly a neo-Nazi
He was an admirer of Hitler, and he collected Nazi paraphernalia. Neither of these make him either a Nazi or a neo-Nazi. In fact, the article gives the impression that he was not a person with any ideological foundation whatsoever, merely a megalomaniacal, bloody despot. Unless some backing can be shown for an assertion that he deserves the Nazi label, I'll remove the Neo-Nazi category shortly. __meco (talk) 12:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes remove it. Hardly anyone in Vietnam think of Ngo Dinh Nhu as a neo-Nazi.Tryst Nguyen (talk) 12:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
