User talk:NFHiB

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, NFHiB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Addhoc 11:32, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Neighbours From Hell in Britain

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Neighbours From Hell in Britain, by Zeraeph (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Neighbours From Hell in Britain fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

seems to be self posted advertising for a non-notable website


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Neighbours From Hell in Britain, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Ref "speedily deleted" tag request of "seems to be self posted advertising for a non-notable website".

This article has been solely created and originally written only for WikiPedia; as can be noted in the article page, 'Neighbours From Hell in Britain (NFHiB)’ is indeed a notable website which is entirely unique within its specific field. It is also a non-profitable organisation of recognised standing, a 5 year history and an excellent reputation as can also be noted within the article’s cited information.

It is not necessary for this organisation to self-promote and attempt to 'solicit' by "self posted advertising" as mistakenly claimed by the WikiPedia user in question. This page has been created to be informative and also has references to other associated research and information sources, for the benefit of all WikiPedia users. It is proposed it should remain within the public domain, to empower and inform other readers who may be experiencing any difficulties with 'Neighbours From Hell'.—Preceding unsigned comment added by NFHiB (talk • contribs)

Hi, I've included a citation and removed the speedy delete tag. Addhoc 00:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello Addhoc, thank you for your message and action, this is much appreciated.—Preceding unsigned comment added by NFHiB (talk • contribs)
Just to let you know that I have now tagged this article for a full WP:AFD (which I probably should have done in the first place). This means that Wikipedia editors will discuss whether the article is sufficiently notable to be retained or not for the next 7 days.
I would advise you to read WP:COI, WP:NOTE and WP:AFD carefully and then post your comments on the article's deletion discussion here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neighbours From Hell in Britain. --Zeraeph 02:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello and thank you for the update/message. Additional References have been added to the article page and there are more to follow over the next 24 hours.NFHiB 11:18, 27 July 2007
Can I give you a bit of advice as a new editor? When you post on talk pages (NOT articles), sign your posts with ~~~~ your ID and time/date of posting will appear as I have put it above?
Also, I am glad you can see that the AFD is nothing personal and that apart from Wikipedia I appreciate what you are doing. I just don't think the article meets with policy in the two areas I mentioned to you. --Zeraeph 12:37, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you Zeraeph for your help and information, it is much appreciated; especially your expertise and WikiPedia experience. We are continuing to add more appropriate referencing. NFHiB 15:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] POV Issues

Seeing the way you are really working with this another piece of advice you could use is to read WP:NPOV. A neutral point of view is hard to define briefly so I'll try to edit a section and show you. Also, it probably isn't a good idea to link your other sites as External Links, especially as they are already linked from the text, see WP:EL --Zeraeph 12:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)