User talk:Nexusb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Contents |
[edit] Re: Bernard Edlington
Normally I would move such a page into your userspace so you could work on it, but I don't see much potential for notability. If you wish to contest the deletion, you are welcome to open a report at deletion review. Cheers! east.718 at 16:43, 11/7/2007
- User:Splash granted your request with this comment:
Since this was deleted following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Edlington, I will restore to a temporary location at User:Nexusb/Bernard Edlington, where you can work on it. Once done, please post a request in the main part of the page below asking to have the deletion set aside. If you are feeling confident that the new article will overcome the objections, you can just move it into place yourself, but note that an article which is substantially identical to that which was deleted will itself be deleted on sight. Splash - tk 01:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- Splash's comment about "the main part of the page below" refers to the main Deletion review page. Rossami (talk) 00:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Bernard Edlington 316.png
Hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 (talk) 17:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re Image:Bernard Edlington 316.png
Yes however I will be uploading another (recent) better one tonight. Please delete it.
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Bernard Edlington 316.jpg
Hi Nexusb!
We thank you for uploading Image:Bernard Edlington 316.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)