User talk:Newm30
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Shelly Battery
Hello. Do you know the exact or approximate location of the Shelly Battery. As soon as I get a rough idea I'll head out that way take some pics and possibly get an article going. Cheers_Ad@m.J.W.C. (talk) 06:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 39th FS
It was a redirect to 39th Flying Training Squadron, a page which never existed! Redirects like this don't really help much, and it's tidier to get rid of them so that it doesn't confuse people looking for created vs. uncreated articles. Shimgray | talk | 18:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] New articles
Thanks for that. Seeing as though there are so many Wollongong related fortification articles, it might be a good idea to create a navigation box to link them up. Then link it up to the Sydney nav box. Maybe we could call it "Barracks · Batteries · Bunkers · Forts · (South Coast New South Wales)". I could get to work on this. Cheers. --User:Adam.J.W.C. (talk) 23:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] New nav box
Just created the new navigation box Template:Barracks Batteries Bunkers and Forts, South Coast, New South Wales. We Just need to fill it in. Cheers . --User:Adam.J.W.C. (talk) 23:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Also don't forget to put coordinates in all these articles, this will eventually lead the the article being placed in Google Earth as a purple dot link for people to click onto. Cheer. --User:Adam.J.W.C. (talk) 23:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
-
-
Thanks. This will help me when I go out to take photos, one day.
Also the long crevasse where you have placed the marker for Smith hill fort, is that part of the tunnel complex. . --User:Adam.J.W.C. (talk) (talk) (talk) 01:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- Thanks. Also you can copy and paste those coords into the Google Earth search for a closer view. --User:Adam.J.W.C. (talk) (talk) (talk) 01:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Is the Drummond Battery still in existence. --User:Adam.J.W.C. (talk) (talk) (talk) 01:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC) Is this the location for Hill 60 http://www.panoramio.com/photo/3687970 . --User:Adam.J.W.C. (talk) (talk) (talk) 01:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Okay cheers, when you start the other project let us know. Cheers. --User:Adam.J.W.C. (talk) (talk) (talk) 02:06, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Template Barracks bunkers and forts
Hi, if you would like to add it into the template I would be all for it, but because I am not an expert in these matters you may need a second opinion. What you could do is add the article to the temp and temp to article and then get the second opinion, maybe ask User talk:Nick Dowling . --User:Adam.J.W.C. (talk) 02:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Newington Arms Depot
Thanks for directing me that article. Back in the mid 90's before the area was landscaped you could see the concrete bunker like buildings set into the hillside from I think Hill Rd. You can't actually see them now unless you walk right upto the fence just down the road from the jail. I could probably get a picture for the article next time I am around the area. I am not sure if it would seem suspicious if I rocked up to the fence and started taking pictures though. --User:Adam.J.W.C. (talk) (talk) 07:22, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject
Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics. |
As you have shown an interest in Mount Druitt Aerodrome we thought you might like to take an interest in this new WikiProject. |
You might like to take an extra interest in our Airports subproject |
We look forward to welcoming you to the project! |
Canglesea (talk) 03:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome to the Aviation WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to aviation.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPAVIATION Announcements}} there.
- Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, and project-wide collaboration.
- We have a number of child projects and task forces that focus on specific topics and aircraft types.
- We're developing a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the experienced project members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Canglesea (talk) 00:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Awards
Wikiwings | ||
For all your work on the Australian aviation articles. Canglesea (talk) 15:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC) |
[edit] re:Scheyville National Park
Sorry for the late reply, Ive been a little tired lately. There was some pretty interesting stuff in that article. I may even head out there when possible to take some pics. When I get around to it I may even head out to some of those south coast fortifications as well.
Also do you think it would be worthwhile writing an article about the Navy Oil storage tanks in the Domain. You know the one. I have actually been inside the tanks, and yes you were right about that place being toxic. When I went there on that night you could smell fumes in the park above the tanks. When I went inside the smell in there was overwhelming. I went in there with a group of about twenty people. Some of the participants had flotation devices and some people swam inside the reservoir. I actually walked all the way around the perimeter through the water which was at about chest hight. The water looked clear except for a thin film of oil on top of the water. The water also had thousands and thousands of white particles floating in the water as well. I was told that the particles had something to do with the breakdown of oil. Later on in the night someone got their torch out and shone it through the darkness, creating a beam of white mist. This mist was toxic fumes that we were breathing in. After a while I felt shaky so I had to climb out. When I got out I also felt dizzy and had slurred speech. You were right, I should never have gone in there, but any way it could lead to another article. I have found one website with a small amount of information on the topic. Obtaining pictures of the sight from below might be a little difficult though. Anyway let us know what you think. Cheers. --User:Adam.J.W.C. (talk) (talk) 01:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- Thanks for that I will look into it when possible. --User:Adam.J.W.C. (talk) (talk) 06:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Infobox Airport
I noticed that you have added the template {{tl:Airport frame}} to your recently created airport articles. That template is an older infobox template, being replaced with a new infobox design. It will save us some time if you use the new Infobox Airport template. Thanks for filling in the missing Australian airports articles. -Canglesea (talk) 02:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Papuan Campaign
Hi, the short answer is no. The name Papua at the time referred to the south-east part of the mainland (the Territory of Papua in 1902-49).
However, "Papuan Campaign" usually only means Kokoda and the Battle of Buna-Gona, although strictly speaking Buna-Gona occurred in the area then known as Territory of New Guinea! Don't ask me... Grant | Talk 15:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- What Grant said. Australia generally doesn't consider the Papuan campaign to have been a single campaign - Kokoda, Milne Bay and Buna-Guna are normally split into seperate campaigns within the overall New Guinea campaign. --Nick Dowling (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)