User talk:Newagelink
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Newagelink, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Sincerely, Ryan 00:27, July 31, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Herland (novel)
Listen, I am totally with you that Herland (novel) is racist and sexist, but your undergraduate research paper doesn't meet WP:RS and if you continue to link to it WP:COI may apply. It has nothing to do with how good the paper is or how smart you are, you just don't have the credentials and the paper itself is not peer reviewed. As absurd as it may be to talk about credentials on Wikipedia, some standards do apply with respect to source material. AlexeiSeptimus 18:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Message
Hey, did you get my message on Facebook? I'm looking to be an RA but I need a housing staff reference, and you're the only one I know. You can delete this thread when you've read it. --Milton 22:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of Suzanne haneef
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Suzanne haneef, by Hu (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Suzanne haneef seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Suzanne haneef, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:10, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Navel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks —Animum (talk) 01:53, 20 January 2008 (UTC)