User talk:New4325

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] BC / BCE issues

Please don't change pages just to change BCE dates to BC. Per the Manual of Style, "It is inappropriate for a Wikipedia editor to change from one style to another unless there is some substantial reason for the change; the Manual of Style favors neither system over the other." eaolson 04:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm going to re-emphasize this. Please don't do that. Oh, and one of your edits from yesterday (here), while you were doing it, introduced a spelling error, century -> centur. -- Why Not A Duck 23:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of 10 days for continued abuse of editing privileges despite repeated warnings. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Raymond Arritt 04:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Raymond Arritt 04:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "There wasn't a single warning given on my talk page. And if there were I would like to no the reason's why I was blocked"

Decline reason: "Unblock reasoning is clearly false; warnings were indeed given. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

No warnings? That's hard to believe, when here you are removing some, and again, including removing what was described as a final warning. Care to explain? – Luna Santin (talk) 21:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

It has been exactly 240 hours. Can you please unblock me.New4325 (talk) 04:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request

All those images on this talk page are a little odd; the purpose of a talk page is to communicate with others, and they sort of distract from that. Would you like me to help you move them to a sub-page? I know that you're blocked right now, and I'd be glad to move them to User:New4325/images on your behalf. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC) Thank youNew4325 (talk) 18:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning on images

As noted above, the purpose of your talk page is to allow communication. All the large images get in the way of that, because they make the page take a very long time to load. I've moved them to the /images subdirectory that FisherQueen mentions. If you persist in this behavior I will extend your block, and may protect your talk page to prevent further abuse. Raymond Arritt (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


sure that would be fine if you could make one —Preceding unsigned comment added by New4325 (talk • contribs) 22:59, 27 November 2007

It already exists. See User:New4325/images. -- Why Not A Duck 23:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please, no personal attacks

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:KathyDavis1962. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Why Not A Duck 18:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Images

Please, use your image page for images; so many images makes the talk page load too slowly for many users. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Buttock augmentation

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Buttock augmentation, you will be blocked from editing. --AliceJMarkham 00:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Tonywalton  | Talk 00:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Tonywalton  | Talk 00:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


The edits in question are [1] and [2] Tonywalton  | Talk 00:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Remain civil

Please remain civil and you lose nothing for doing so. Assume good faith in other's edits, and try to achieve consensus of both sides. "They" will be looking for some pretexts to block you and don't let them do so! Cheers, Ranch coacher 04:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Excuse Me!

Excuse me? I don't understand your comment in my talk page! Did I offense you or what? --User:Yacht (talk) 03:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] WikiProject Awards Role Call

WikiProject Awards Rolecall
To check whether all of our members are still interested, we have blanked the members list, if you still wish to take part please add your name back on the list. Please wait until the 4th January to re-add your name.

// F9T 19:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Awards Center Newsletter

I'm pleased to announce that the Awards Center will be getting its own newsletter shortly. If you want to receive the WP:AWC newsletter, put your name here. --Sharkface217 20:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Libya

Libya has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.