User talk:New4321
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] October 2007
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Global cooling. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Gscshoyru 17:32, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reply
America is home to libertarianism and I am a libertarian. It is a great wonderful country where I was pleased to live and where there is place for every ethnic group, every religion, every political opinion. I support it principally because I love its people and its political system. --Checco 03:41, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- I find difficult to understand your point. Before I thought that you were the usual anti-American... Can you explain your position? Anyway, I agree with you that the United States is the greatest country in the world. --Checco 03:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- So what? --Checco 03:54, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- I was asking you abouy the question I wrote above. Anyway, I probably got the answer now: all started by the confusion about the meaning of "liberal" in Europe and in the United States, quite opposite meanings. For this reason I preferred to use "libertarian" in my user page. --Checco 04:02, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 03:58, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your user page...
- ...says "I look for vandalism and people who believe in global warming so I can argue with them with out cursing." You might want to reconsider that stance as it's a definite violation of WP:POINT and a possible violation of WP:CIVIL. Thanks. JuJube 23:25, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit on an arbitration page
Hi. I saw that you undid my courtesy blanking of the workshop page in a recently closed arbitration case. This was done based upon precedent where the arbitration involved a known individual, and at that individual's request. Therefore, I have reverted your change. Please note that the complete text of the page remains available in the page history, so no information has been lost. Please also note that I am an Arbitration Committee Clerk and authorized to make edits of this nature. If there are any questions, please feel free to let me know. Regards, Newyorkbrad 03:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Software configuration management/MEE
Mind explaining why you reverted my deletion of this page? RossPatterson 22:27, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] November 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Natural environment, you will be blocked from editing. Gabriel Kielland 17:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User Talk:Wikilost, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikilost 01:27, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Please be careful with your edits. One of your edits to Andrew R. Cobb attempting to revert vandalism actually re-added vandalism into an article. --Ben James Ben 00:33, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sheridan Elementary School
A tag has been placed on Sheridan Elementary School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AecisBrievenbus 23:28, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Germany Invitation
|
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 15:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
