Talk:New York State Route 9N
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA review
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- MOS probably specifies that boldlinks are only permitted in lead sections.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
Congrats! —Rob (talk) 03:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- AFAIK placing terms that redirect to the article in boldface is acceptable; if it isn't, it should be brought up on WT:USRD as this practice is in place on many state projects. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 03:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Categories: Wikipedia good articles | Wikipedia CD Selection-GAs | GA-Class Good articles | Engineering and technology good articles | GA-Class New York road transport articles | Mid-importance New York road transport articles | GA-Class U.S. road transport articles | Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles