Talk:New York State Route 9A

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article New York State Route 9A has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
October 28, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics New York State routes
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article was the selected article of the U.S. Roads Portal in December 2007.
The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force.
New York State Route 9A is a selected article of the New York State routes WikiProject; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the WikiProject and serves as a model for all other New York State route articles to emulate. If you can update or improve it, please do.
This article was featured on WP:NYSR in October 2007.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hudson Valley, a project dedicated to improving articles related to the Hudson Valley of New York. If you would like to participate and help, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Hudson Valley.

6A shown Yonkers-Elmsford-Briarcliff Manor-Millwood-Croton Lake-Yorktown ending at 37 (US 6) on 1928 map - looks like roughly current 9A-100-118-132

[edit] Passed Good Article nomination!

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

No apparent problems with prose, well-cited, images where appropriate. This is also the 3000th good article. NF24(radio me!Editor review) 23:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)