Talk:New York State Route 380

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article New York State Route 380 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
April 9, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics New York State routes
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force.

[edit] Decomissioned vs. deleted

I noticed decomissioned was changed to deleted in the infobox due to the fact that decomisisoned is a neologism. For starters, this may or may not be true, but the route was not deleted, per se, it was just removed from state control. Deleted implies the route no longer exists. Smartyllama 19:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

You may have better success if you post this comment at WT:USRD instead. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 20:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
The route no longer exists. --NE2 21:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Southern terminus photo

I have added a photo of the approximate former southern terminus of NY 380. Feel free to edit anything you want about it (size, positioning, caption, etc.). Skudrafan1 (talk) 18:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GA review

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Needs a few {{convert}} templates, and other imperial units should be mentioned in metric as well.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    The length of the route should be noted in the lead. Areas mentioned seem to be rural, but does it run through the "downtowns" of municipalities? Just curious.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Good job! —Rob (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Convert templates are done. As per your other issue, NY 380 is gone, making this irrelevant in most ways, but when it existed, not really.Mitch32contribs 19:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Makes sense. Looks good. Thanks! —Rob (talk) 19:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)