Talk:New York State Route 323/GA1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA Review
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Prose isn't too good. I count nine variations of "intersected" in 10 sentences of the RD. Some awkward wording, as wel.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Ref 5 isn't a RS.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- No images, but for GA's sake, the infobox map is enough.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
This new review process stinks, but that's besides the point. There are some prose issues which need to be resolved, so I've placed the article on-hold. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, looks better. Passses GA. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)