Talk:New York State Route 28
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] i-587
Does the whole route cosing with NY-28? It is a existing normal route, why merge it with this article? Shouldwe put I-587 infobox section back to this article? Otherwise I dont think the merge will make sense?--Freewayguy Discuss Infolog 23:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Read the realignments section of the article; I did add an I-587 shield to illustrate. All of I-587 is concurrent with NY 28. The whole history of I-587 is here and isn't enough to support a separate article that would essentially duplicate just that section. There is no I-587 shield on the parent route, for one thing. I did modify the I-587 redirect to this particular section. The browse feature for 587 as well as the I-87 3di series is present and is, IMO, sufficient.
Some useful information in the form of photographs is available here at gribblenation.net and here at Empire State Roads.
As an aside, I can say that I've bicycled the entire length of said interstate highway in both directions, over 25 years ago.Fwgoebel (talk) 01:32, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
I did see the blue guide signs, and I saw the I-587 signs exist, I bet now they still do. I know I-190/SR 190; I-290/SR 290 is two distinctive routes, and they have no way, I would even think about merging it, simply like I-238/SR 238 in California. Those routes should definitely not be merge.--Freewayguy Discussions Show all changes 23:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Categories: Wikipedia good articles | Wikipedia CD Selection-GAs | GA-Class Good articles | Engineering and technology good articles | Old requests for peer review | GA-Class Interstate Highway System articles | Mid-importance Interstate Highway System articles | GA-Class New York road transport articles | Mid-importance New York road transport articles | GA-Class U.S. road transport articles | Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles | GA-Class Hudson Valley articles | Low-importance Hudson Valley articles | Wikipedia featured article candidates