Talk:New York State Route 149

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	New York State Route 149 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
April 14, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

	This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics	New York State routes
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force.

This article is linked by [1], so if you notice weird edits that's why. --SPUI (T - C) 01:47, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   {{convert}} templates needed. en-dashes needed for "Vermont–New York".

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   "The section of U.S. 4 in Vermont between the New York / Vermont border and Rutland, Vermont was built to Interstate Highway specifications in anticipation of this." -- requires a reference. For FA purposes, bostonroads.com may not be a reliable source.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Let me know when you've completed the fixes! —Rob (talk) 04:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

One question real quick - is the map of the concurrency necessary to understanding the route's description? —Rob (talk) 04:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

I thought of it to be a more generalized map so that a person who's been there can recognize the article and map. Otherwise, everything you listed has been fixed.^Mitch32^contribs 12:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

All right. I've taken a couple cracks at it, and now I think it looks good. —Rob (talk) 17:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC)