Talk:New Year's Revolution (2007)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
New Year's Revolution (2007) has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment. | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
 |
New Year's Revolution (2007) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions. |
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] This photo doesnt belong
the picture of K-Fed, Big Show, and Booker has nothing to do with this event. It works for Cyber Sunday, but no one in that picture was at the event. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juniorlizard (talk • contribs) 00:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:WWEnyr07.jpg
Image:WWEnyr07.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article contains information to the appropriate depth and perhaps too much. The structure of the article requires some development.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
Add a citation for the tagline and attendance number.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
The major aspects are not clearly stated and identified in the first Background paragraph. Use a descriptive lead sentence.
- B. Focused:
The Background paragraphs are long and confusing. Requires rewriting or reorganizing. Some of the information is not entirely relevant and should be removed. Paragraphs should be split.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
The first picture is not directly relevant to the Cena/Umaga feud. Flair picture's caption needs to state its relevance to the event.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Please address the above concerns and notify me for a reevaluation. --13 of Diamonds (talk) 04:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
[edit] Reevaluation
fix the spelling in the third paragraph of the intro, and in "which Hary won by escaping the cage".- I still think the Background paragraphs are a bit long.
"hanging upside-down 15 feet in the air". Note that he was hanging from the cage."sunset flips-turned-powerbombs". Provide a link.Reassess each use of "yet".Use of "headline" accurate in "Donald Trump and Vince McMahon which would go on to headline WrestleMania 23"?Inconsistency with the capitalization of "The Hardys"."The other two feuds were closely intertwined." elaborate, clarify."The first contest of the night". Incorrect."After this spectacle". "spectacle" is subjective.- "Royal Rumble" (the event) should not preceded by "the".
- IMO, "the" should be there. I mean, does "the proceeding month at Royal Rumble..." really make sense. This was also an argument with the Survivor Series (1991) article on whether or not "the" should be included when mentioning Joe Louis Arena. –Cheers, LAX 11:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
There is a mix of both with and without "the". Be consistent and use one.--13 of Diamonds (talk) 23:46, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
References by nicknames ("Samoan Bulldozer") and descriptions ("Caribbean Superstar") is unnecessary and confusing.People should be not be referred to by given name only. (Mickie, Shawn, Jeff, etc.)"the FU" should be changed to "an FU".Grammar: "were both confronted by security" should be "both were".Subsequent uses of a name (person or team) in a paragraph should be consistent in being surname only. Same should be done for established contractions (DX).
--13 of Diamonds (talk) 11:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- For a ten-minute match, a more detailed description should be added for the Flair/Dykstra match. --13 of Diamonds (talk) 23:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- Not really. You could have a 5 minute match with lots of major things happening in it, but you could have a 10 minute match which doesn't have many major events in it and could be considered boring, hence why the Flair/Dykstra part is only a few lines. My guess is that there wasn't anything hugely major in it. D.M.N. (talk) 18:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- I've looked over this, and I can't really see any reasons why the GA (2nd opinion requested, it says) shouldn't be passed, so I have done so. Tell me if I've screwed up! dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 00:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
