Talk:New Miserable Experience
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
|
[edit] Original Release
It's stated that the 1992 release differed from the 1993 release, wouldn't it be worthwhile to note these differences? Or is it just different artwork? Johnsorc 15:46, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- As far as I know, it's only different artwork. I have the superduper expanded edition and it doesn't appear to mention a different listing or anything. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 17:34, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- Cool, thanks! Is the extra content on the expanded edition worth buying? I haven't gotten it yet, but I've thought about it. Johnsorc 21:52, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- It has a lot of hard-to-find early EP stuff, and some good live tracks. Great if you're a big fan like me. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 04:05, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
- Cool, thanks! Is the extra content on the expanded edition worth buying? I haven't gotten it yet, but I've thought about it. Johnsorc 21:52, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell, the difference is only in the artwork. For example, the layout on the original is much simpler - the insert is only a four-panel fold-out with pictures of the band taken during the recording sessions, and lacks lyrics. (The original just looks lower budget, honestly. Though, admittedly, I'm fond of it because of how much I listened to it in early '93 - it's the version I think of when I hear the songs now.) -- ChrisB 06:01, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:GinBlossomsNewMiserableExperienceOriginal.jpg
Image:GinBlossomsNewMiserableExperienceOriginal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
