Talk:New Jersey Route 33

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics New Jersey State and County Routes
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force.
This article's exit list has been marked as needing attention.
Good article New Jersey Route 33 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.

Why wouldn't NJ 66 be ok at this page, they split, or would they paralell one another? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nextbarker (talk • contribs)

NJ 66 isn't listed for two reasons. First, as you mentioned, they parallel each other, so it doesn't really go anywhere significant that Route 33 doesn't at least go near. Also, it's in virtually the same place as the junction with the parkway, so listing it here is somewhat redundant.
I've added Route 18 back to the junction list (I'm curious as to why it was removed in the first place). Route 35 is not included because -- although it is major -- it's superfluous to list three separate junctions in Neptune Township. -- NORTH talk 15:38, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Maybe Route 18 isn't that big, the next big exit after that is Route 138. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nextbarker (talk • contribs) 15:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Why are you looking in only one direction? Just because it ends two miles to the south doesn't change that it's a freeway to New Brunswick. -- NORTH talk 15:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Would Business Route 33 be ok on the info box? I would think that's pretty majro, since regular 33 can;t get to the Freehold Raceway or the Mall —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nextbarker (talk • contribs) 15:55, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

No, because it can access them via US 9, which is already listed, and it's only necessary to list the most major of the Freehold junctions. -- NORTH talk 16:06, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

If I were to add a NJ 79 shields, that wouldn't work out since that's in Freehold, right? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nextbarker (talk • contribs) 16:25, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Exactly. -- NORTH talk 23:15, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

I guess the mentioning would also apply to the US Route 1 shield on the 287 info because it ends 1 mile from Route 1. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.228.70.72 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Right. That's what it says on Talk:Interstate 287. -- NORTH talk 21:29, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Would NJ 34 and NJ 33 intersect in Farmingdale or Howell, NJ

24.228.70.72 04:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC) Nextbarker

Their northern junction in Howell. Farmingdale is a small borough several miles southwest of the intersection of NJ 33 and 34.
Their southern junction is just over the Wall Twp line, but I would prefer to list only Howell, as I feel it's a better description of where it is. -- NORTH talk 16:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Assessment

Nice job on this article, for a good article Nomination, i suggest adding a history section.Mitchazenia(7500+edits) 01:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] GA on hold

There are some problems with this article:

  • History section needs to be expanded and have more sources.
    • Also, please get rid of the bullet that exists in that section.
  • Route description needs sources.
  • Please separate the junction lists with the exit list, as the new junction template looks just like the exit list.
  • Make sure the article stays stable.

That's all for GA. (→zelzany - new age roads) 22:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Also make sure the exit list is compliant to WP:USRD/ELG. There's the blue "Begin/End Concurrency" in the notes column that needs to be fixed. - JA10 Discuss • Edits 15:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Failed

I've failed this mainly because the junction/exit lists are all screwed up; the only freeway section is the Freehold Bypass. You need to use correct section headers and tables, as readers (even I) get confused when it says it is a freeway when it's not. Also, "future improvements" is POV, which isn't allowed. (→zelzany - new age roads) 20:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Passed

With the improvements made since the previous GA nomination, it looks like all the concerns raised before have been addressed. Congratulations! Ƙɽɨɱρᶓȶ 01:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)