Talk:New Brunswick Route 95

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Canada Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Canada Roads
This article is part of the Canada Roads WikiProject (Discuss/Join).
New Brunswick
This article is part of the New Brunswick WikiProject (Discuss/Join).

[edit] move

  • COMMENT There is no standard provincial highway naming scheme. It does and should go by province, and provinces name things differently. 132.205.44.43 20:27, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
    • Wikipedia has a naming convention, which says that in certain circumstances titles shouldn't be capitalised. "New Brunswick Highway X" is probably incorrect, and "New Brunswick highway X" is an improvement, but I prefer "New Brunswick provincial highway X" because it is more spacific. AlbertR 21:05, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
      • Excepting capitalization, which is another issue, how does New Brunswick name their provincial highways? That should be the way the article is named. I seem to find "NB Arterial Highway xx", but I doubt that is correct.132.205.3.20 19:04, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

This article has been renamed after the result of a move request. Moved on the basis of the apparent naming convention expressed by Category:New Brunswick provincial highways. Dragons flight 23:30, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

I know it's too late for this, but for what it's worth, New Brunswick's DOT tends to prefer "Route xx". Kirjtc2 06:18, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

What was Route 95's number before I-95 was designated? This 1951 map shows it as 5, but according to List of New Brunswick provincial highways there was a large renumbering in 1965. --SPUI (T - C - RFC) 06:37, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

It was still 5 after 1965. The number switched around 1976. Kirjtc2 14:23, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
After I think about it and after seeing some old maps, there's more that I need to mention. An entirely new alignment was built ca. 1976, and that became 95. The old 5 became 150 and later 555. Kirjtc2 19:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)