Talk:New Beacon School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Kent WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the county of Kent in South East England.
If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.)
Low This article is on a subject of low-importance for Kent-related articles.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.


WikiProject Schools This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-Importance within Schools.

[edit] Article and school name

The name of this school appears to be The New Beacon School [1]. Anyone object to a move? -- zzuuzz (talk) 02:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of Tradition, Discipline & Terminology sections

These sections are not appropriate content for wikipedia. I have given links to the relevant policies and guidelines, selectively quoted from them, and given an example of where the deleted material fell short:

WP:V

The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. "Verifiable" in this context means that readers should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed.

"The class room had to be disbanded as it was deemed a health hazard due to the large amount of mould growing on the walls. Recently it was found that the classroom contained asbestos and has therefore been sealed off."

Really?

WP:NOR

Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought. This includes unpublished facts, arguments, speculation, and ideas

"This tradition originated from an ancient Yule ceremony which was started as a form of punishment to those who stole from the harvest."

Is there anything to confirm this?

WP:LIVING

Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just questionable — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from Wikipedia articles

"Ian Funnel - a.k.a. Funky - in room 21, the longest serving teacher at the school and a former old boy"

I'm sure Mr Funnel would enjoy seeing his details published.

WP:NOTE

A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

"The worst punishment is known as a "minus". This is used for disciplinary action. The boy(s) have to knock on the common room door and ask for the minus book. Their name is then entered into the book whereupon it will be read out by the Headmaster in Friday Chapel. The boy is then force to stand up and walk down the aisle on his own and proceed to the Headmaster's office where he will receive a severe telling off. He then missees all break times for a week and is force to do oddjobs. Teachers have given minuses out over a wide range of offenses (ranging from breathing too loudly to trying to stab another boy)"

Who needs to know this information?
Ewen (talk) 21:26, 7 January 2008 (UTC)