User talk:Neutrality/workshop II

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Joe Scarborough

Hi Neutrality, thank you for bringing this matter to arbitration. Now, perhaps User:OldRight could make meaningful contributions to the Wikipedia community if he used a NPOV instead of writing in a Rightish POV. I've come to the honest conclusion that User:OldRight thinks that a rightish POV needs defense here on Wikipedia. I don't think he realizes that implementing his POV doesn't defend anything at all. He needs to realize that we are an encylopedia, that we are trying to write from an aura of neutrality. He doesn't assume good faith from other editors, it appears that he assumes that everyone is out to attack him.

I find his actions quite odd, after all, I have communicated with other editors that share his views on politics, etc, but do not ruin the intergrity of Wikipedia by placing things from a non NPOV. I've tried communicating with User:OldRight to defend why a certain paragraph in the Joe Scarborough article doesn't belong, and he has failed to let us know why. I even tend to agree that that paragraph doesn't belong, not from a political perspective, I just feel it deserves its own article due to other reasons stated in the Talk section. However, User:OldRight seems bent on "attacking" a "left-wing" conspiracy he thinks is going on within our encylopedia.

So again, thank you for bringing this to the arbcom's attention. Conradrock 06:18, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)