User talk:Netwhizkid
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Contents |
[edit] Unblock
Alright, unblocked, I'll put a shared IP notice up on the page. Sasquatch t|c 19:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors.
Kind regards,
Anthøny 19:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- FYI, Talk:Kenmare has some discussion you might be interested in. Anthøny 19:52, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- oh dear. You're still at it - Alison ☺ 21:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kilgarvan
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. - Mdbrownmsw (talk) 20:27, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kilgarvan. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Please do not delete tags requesting sources without addressing the concern. - Mdbrownmsw (talk) 20:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kilgarvan, you will be blocked from editing. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Consider this your final warning. Kilgarvan is not your article. While your contributions are valued, the unsourced opinion in your preferred version cannot remain. Please discuss this on the talk page of the article. Thank you! - Mdsummermsw (talk) 22:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Recession of 2008
An editor has nominated Recession of 2008, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recession of 2008 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)