User talk:Netperceptions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi there. Welcome to Wikipedia. When you get a chance, drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log to introduce yourself. You can sign your name on talk pages by using " ~~~ " for your username and " ~~~~ " for your username and a timestamp.

You should also feel free to drop me a question on my talk page. I'll answer if I'm here.

Happy editing, HornandsoccerContribsTalk 02:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent insertion of spam, commercial content, and/or links is prohibited under policy. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your ip address being blocked from editing Wikipedia. MER-C 05:00, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Net Perceptions

A tag has been placed on Net Perceptions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.


Wikipedia is not the place to advertise your company. -- Fan-1967 21:22, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] To be absolutely honest

I've never yet seen someone manage to create an unbiased, encyclopedic article on their own company. In my experience, Conflict of Interest makes it practically impossible. When people create articles on themselves, they always look like ads, even when the authors believe them to be unbiased. IBM and Microsoft did not create the articles on those companies. Notable companies don't need to. Other people create articles on them if they're deserving of an article, and numerous other people will contribute. Dozens of people have contributed to those articles. Fan-1967 22:26, 30 December 2006 (UTC)