User talk:NetProfit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, NetProfit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 10:52, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Revert-warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ilinden-Preobrazhenie Uprising‎ . Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Ah, sorry about that, no, the talk page should certainly not be semi-protected. I'll fix it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Anti-Hellenism

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Hellenism. We've had this article before, and it was deleted. I'd not recommend trying to re-create something like it again. Right now, your one-line stub hardly counts as an article - would you mind if I just deleted it? (I guess I could do that anyway, under the Wikipedia:Speedy deletion criteria.) Sorry about that, Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Uhhmmm... yes, having a link in the template when the article isn't going to be revived any time soon is pretty lame, isn't it. Why would he want it? Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Population of Greece

Your number on the population of ethnic Greeks is unsupported by reference. In fact a reference I found for your number (http://www.world-gazetteer.com/wg.php?x=&men=gpro&lng=en&dat=32&geo=-92&srt=npan&col=aohdq), bears no claim for ethnic Greeks, just population in general, in which case I much prefer the Eurostat number, due to higher reliability. So please provide proper reference. -Ferengi 23:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Can you be a bit more specific? There is no link to the 2001 census in the article (you should have placed one) and the copy in Greek that I have does not mention this number. -Ferengi 23:17, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Term

Welcome. Hope you take into account certain 'balances' that are maintained by long standing and experienced editors and join in the discussions when you see things differently. Politis 12:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Amazing re: Image:ЕUUU.gif!! It should obviously be removed (after I copy it for my archives). Good research! If you find any other gems, please let me know. Politis 14:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

It is already there from long ago :-) I am familiar with their work; it seems to me that they are basically interested in funds, they have found their niche in Human Rights. Unfortunately for Human Rights in Greece, they also confuse HR with being very antagonistic towards Greece; this means they alienate Greeks instead of persuading them. They are ignored by most people and they are of limited use to the Greek HR movement; with their attitude, they contribute towards Greek misunderstanding of the Macedonian issue and of the Slavomacedonians. They also tend to misquote, especially headlines. Politis 14:43, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, :-) personally I would put it down to their limited intellect and selective sensitivity. Some of their funding may originate from uncomfortable sources, but, I seem to remember, they have also received funds from the Greek state. They thrive on publicity and reproduce via emails any attention given to them. I say 'they' but in fact it just about boils down to one guy who, it appears, guards jealously his territory and the funding that comes with it (can we say it is his private milking cow?); one could argue that he is probably personally responsible for discouraging and keeping away other Greeks interested in HR... Politis 11:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for edit-warring

I've blocked both you and Fatmanonthehorse for sterile edit-warring on Skopje. I suppose you saw my warning on the talk page: Talk:Skopje#Unprotected. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Hardly sterile, I did give a full explanation on the talkpage. Can I (we?) be unblocked if I promise to not revert again for the duration of the block?--NetProfit 22:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Well, I guess that should be okay. But make that: no reverts on any article, okay? Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Yes absolutely.--NetProfit 22:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

I understand you are another Bulgar who is obsessed with the great people of Macedonia. Just watch what you say to my Macedonian brothers, you do not want to make an enemy out of me. PS. Ask your breakfast club friends ForeignerFromTheEast and Laveol about me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.199.222 (talk) 05:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)