Talk:Net@nite

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Correct spelling

Noticed that the logo spells it "Net@Night". However, in creating this article I have used the spelling "Net@nite" that seems to be the 'official' one on the [[1]] and [[2]] sites. MartinBrook t 13:32, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Net@nite.jpg

Image:Net@nite.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

The Net@nite logo along with most other work on TWIT.tv is licensed under Creative Commons --Bob12321 00:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion - or merge instead?

I'm still fairly inexperienced in wikipedia regarding what makes a subject notable. My impression is that this podcast is one of the most downloaded twit podcasts, but at the moment I don't have time to chase up statistics or citations. Anyone care to step in?

Failing that, wouldn't it be better to merge this article into TWiT.tv (network) instead of deleting? MartinBrook t 09:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)