User talk:Nerdypunkkid

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Speedy deletion of Dan Nainan

A tag has been placed on Dan Nainan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.

[edit] Speedy deletion of Dan Nainan

A tag has been placed on Dan Nainan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.

[edit] Speedy deletion of Dan Nainan

A tag has been placed on Dan Nainan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. CardinalDan (talk) 17:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Dan Nainan

A tag has been placed on Dan Nainan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Drewhamilton (talk) 06:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


Looks like this is the only article you make. Maybe it's time to stop? Drewhamilton (talk) 07:00, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Dan Nainan, you will be blocked from editing. Drewhamilton (talk) 07:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Dan nainan

A tag has been placed on Dan nainan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Dan Nainan

A tag has been placed on Dan Nainan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Drewhamilton (talk) 20:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, as you did with Dan Nainan, you will be blocked from editing. Drewhamilton (talk) 20:28, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dan Nainan.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dan Nainan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:10, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Dan nainan

A tag has been placed on Dan nainan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Drewhamilton (talk) 08:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Final warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Dan nainan, you will be blocked from editing. - KrakatoaKatie 09:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism-only

This appears to be a single-purpose vandalism-only account. You have been warned several times and yet you ignore and continue.

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(info: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

Ian Cairns (talk) 11:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I have been accused of using this web site for vandalism but i have not in any way used it for such purpose. I have used it to make a valuable contribution. I have written an article about indian comedian Dan nainan. Eventhough i'm an amature and not a pro at wikipedia i tried to follow the guild lines. I have cited my sources with referesnes and proved why he is a notable person worthy of an wikipedia article. I don't know why my article got delted and being up for sevral days. I would like to put it back up and continue to work on it. Can you please review my block and see that i'm not a vandale and can you tell me why my article was marked for deletion. 16:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "You did not establish with citations to reliable sources why Mr. Nainan was notable. You can use the {{hangon}} template, as the speedy deletion notice indicated. You are not supposed to repeatedly recreate the article ... that's disruptive editing. You were issued warnings, which you disregarded. Any further explanation needed? You have committed several blockable offenses. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Please state the reason which accompanied the respective unblock request.
If none is available, use {{Request denied}} instead."

Decline reason: "duplicate, see below. Mangojuicetalk 15:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

First i want to appoligise for any trouble i caused you or wikipedia it was not intentional

I did continue to repost the article but each time i added more and more infomation to it. I cited sources. one from the NYtimes and one from a 3rd party web site. I beleive i showed why he was notable :performed at major theators i.e the apollo. I had sources that i cited and was working on getting more when my article was deleted. I want to finish the article and how can we make this possible without the past being repeated.

I lookward to hearing from you

Thanks

Will you agree to follow Wikipedia procedures on this? This needs to go through Wikipedia:Deletion review and you need to agree to abide by the outcome and not keep reposting the article if the community decides against it. Mangojuicetalk 14:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Below"

Decline reason: "Also below — Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Each time i reposted the article it was bigger and better than before. I will finish the article with all appropiate citations and then post it for review. Can you give me access to the sandbox and what ever else i would need to do this.

Thanks

PS: Sorry for any trouble i caused you

We will not unblock you unless you agree to abide by community procedure on this. No more drafts; after so many deletions, the community needs to consider whether this topic is appropriate for coverage, and you need to abide by its decision. Mangojuicetalk 15:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Please place a new unblock template up once you have responded. You may also want to look over our deletion policy, which outlines the purpose of deletion review and how it works. Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


{{[[Template:unblock Understood i will abide by the procedures. No more drafts the next one that will go up will be the finished product with referenses and links

Could i get some tips - how does the review process work - how many referenses and sourses are considered a good amount - what type of external 3rd party links can i put what can't i put - how do i show that its notable - how do i learn why the article was delted in the past - how to i go about getting further help

Thanks|unblock Understood i will abide by the procedures. No more drafts the next one that will go up will be the finished product with referenses and links

Could i get some tips - how does the review process work - how many referenses and sourses are considered a good amount - what type of external 3rd party links can i put what can't i put - how do i show that its notable - how do i learn why the article was delted in the past - how to i go about getting further help

Thanks]]}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

You seem to understand what is wrong. I will try to help you do it right.

Request handled by: Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

--Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Starting new articles

First, some reading material:

OK. Lets go over a couple of things. First of all, there is the concept of notability. In Wikipedia terms, this means that the subject of an article has received:

  1. extensive coverage in
  2. multiple
  3. reliable
  4. and independant sources

Extensive means that it is more than just a trivial mention. What is trivial? Well, for a comedian, a notice in a newpaper arts section that merely notes when and where the comedian will be performing... well thats trivial. An multiple-paragraph review of his work, a biography, an interview, etc. would all be extensive coverage. We need more than just one or two of these... that's where the multiple comes in. Reliable means that the source exhibits editorial control. Things like major daily newspapers, magazines, peer-reviewed journals, trade journals, and books published by major publishing houses are all reliable, as are websites of major news organization. Unreliable sources would include things like blogs, forums, bulletin boards, myspace, facebook, youtube, etc. that is anything where anyone can write anything and it isn't checked. Independent means that the person who wrote it has NO connection to the subject itself. Thus, a biography of the comedian at his own website, while IMPORTANT, and likely containing useful information for the article cannot of itself be used to establish notability. Now, lets say that such sources do not exist. The subject should not have an article at Wikipedia. Its that simple. Our next lesson will be on how to properly work on a draft article in your userspace. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Creating a draft article in your user namespace

Wikipedia is divided into different "namespaces". This page, for example, is in the "User talk:" namespace. There's the "User:" namespace, which contains all of the userpages for different users. There's the "Help:" namespace, which contains manuals and tutorials for using the MediaWiki software. There's the "Wikipedia:" namespace, that contains all of the policies, procedures, and guidelines for using Wikipedia specifically, etc. There's also the article namespace (it has no prefix), which is where all of the articles themselves are kept. While Wikipedia has strict rules over what sorts of material should exist in the article namespace (see the last section on notability. Also WP:5P is a good guide to this as well). you are given much greater lee-way over the management of your user namespace.

In your user space, you can create subpages(see WP:SUBPAGE), which you could use to work on draft versions of articles. To create a subpage of your user space, go to your user page, and create the following link: [[/DRAFT]]. You could replace the word "draft" with anything you'd like. Then, click the link and create the page. This will create the page User:Nerdypunkkid/DRAFT. Since this is in your user space, you can use this subpage to work on an article before it is ready to go live as an article. This gives you time and leeway to make it meet all Wikipedia guidelines (see last section), and thus it won't keep getting instantly deleted. There are some restrictions even in your namespace. Any work done here should be at least tangentally related to building the encyclopedia. You should not us it to advertise or promote something or someone, you should not use it to attack or defame someone, you should not use your userspace as a place to simply goof off or chat with friends. However, since you plan on working on an article, you can clearly do that. Once the article is ready to go live, and be moved to the main space, drop me a note on my talk page, and I will look it over, and help you move it to the main space, if it is appropriate to do so. Hope this has been of some help. If you run into any more trouble, just drop a note on my talk page, and I'll see if I can help out! --Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)