User talk:Neoballmon III

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Guten Tag!

Hi. I hate the red link, so I'm just going to start to type some random crap that as usual when I do this, noone reads because it goes on for ages and ages and generally has no relevance to anything at all, but I just enjoy it because it's the possibility to do it. I could offer money and I highly doubt anyone would read it far enough to be able to claim the money. And while I'm talking about offering money, I might do so..I will give you $3 if you read this, and all you have to do is send me a $5 cheque (I need the extra $2 to be able to send the money to you without going into a loss at all as well as to cover the processing fee for the cheque. Anyway, as for getting rid of the red link, I think it's gone by now, it was probably gone before I even finished typing Hi but I might as well just type some more crap to make sure it'll never be back! Surprisingly though, I'm starting to get bored of this already, which I think must be the earliest I've ever gotten bored of doing this, so I guess I'll bid you good day and giidnguth to you all!! -- Neoballmon III 09:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Rick.istall

A tag has been placed on Rick.istall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Non-dropframe (talk) 23:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

You didn't even give me a change to 'hangon'!!! You deleted it! How could you do that to me????? Neoballmon III (talk) 23:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

PLEASE VISIT [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.92.1.32 (talk) 01:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed deletion of Omg a duck

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Omg a duck, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Fléêťflämẽ U-T-C 02:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC)