Talk:Neo-Zionism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Suggestion
I think there also need to be a Seculer Neo-Zionism artical. (IP)
[edit] Viewpoint
This article uses almost exclusively the writings and terms of post-Zionists. Zionist and objective sources should be used as well. The most obvious example of this problem is that "neo-Zionists" do not call themselves by that phrase. FC (talk) 22:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- The Kumah people call themselves "neo-Zionists". They call Likud neo-Zionist, but I don't see that Likud calls itself that. The Kumah web site seems to be the main proponent of the term. There are academic references, but it's not clear they're talking about the same thing. Most of the article seems to come from this reference: [1]. The Kumah version of neo-Zionism seems to be associated with the settlements movement and the Greater Israel effort. Not sure what to make of this. --John Nagle (talk) 16:48, 26 April 2008 (UTC)