Talk:Neo-Theosophy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There is no reason for this as a separate article. If it can not be merged with another article, it would be better to remove it. Kwork 18:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
The term Neo-Theosophy is not in general use, and this article seems an effort to to introduce it into use. That amounts to Original Research. Kwork 21:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- No it's not original research, nor am I trying to introduce a neologism. See Google Book Search or follow the links at the bottom of the page M Alan Kazlev 03:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
It simply is not a term that is in use, but rather a term you want to bring into use. The books that introduced that term are about as obscure as it is possible to get, and I would be surprised to find that any one but you, or other specialists in esotericism, has read them in decades. Kwork 11:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- well that's the whole thing about an encyclopaedia. It shouldn't just be about well-known knowledge, but also about less well known knowledge. Obviously, not all of Wikipedia's one million plus pages are on well known subjects M Alan Kazlev 01:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
In Wikipedia you seem the Johny Appleseed of Neo-Theosophy. Kwork 11:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)